Rabu, 17 Mei 2017

school profile

 MAN MODEL BANDA ACEH School Profile

Name of school                  : Man Model Banda Aceh
Status                                    : state school
Phone Number                   : (0651) 636804
District                                  : Keuramat
Sub district                          : Kuta Alam
City                                         : Banda Aceh
Province                                : Aceh
Post Code                              : 23123
Email  : mandelbandaaceh@gmail.com/ info@mandelbna.sch.id
Website                                 : www.manmodelbna.sch.id
Accreditation                      : A
School Statistic Number : 311117103002
Founded year                      : 1957
Headmaster                         : Drs. H Mukhlis Mpd
Previous Study                    : S2 Syiah Kuala University
School Area                          : 8500 M2


The History  

MAN MODEL Banda Aceh began  from private schools SMIA (Islamic Secondary School SMA), founded in 1957 by SMI & SMIA foundation. The school was only have one program study (religious program) and led by Ustazd H. Nurdin Ahmad Hanafi. He led the SMIA until 1960 and continued by TGK. Sulaiman Jalil until 1963. Subsequently, his leadership was replaced by Mr. Ibrahim Amin until 1968. During this period the SMI / SMIA Foundation of Aceh asked the Department of Religious Affairs in order that  SMIA to be transformed into a state immediately. Alhamdulillah, the request was received and based on the Minister of Religion affairs (KHA Dahlan)  No.172  Year 1968  on August  7th, 1968  SMIA had become a state school .  The name was changed in to   MAAIN (Madrasah Aliyah Agama Islam  Negeri ) Banda Aceh TMT January 1, 1968. At that time, MAAIN had two programs study : Paspal and Sassosbud. There was three classrooms,  there were (class  1, 2 and 3) with the number of students entirely as much as ± 25 people. Furthermore, MAAIN led by Drs. Hashim Abdul Djalil until September 1974. During  his reign  a new building  was built.  The number of students  as much as ± 54 people.Then,MAAIN led by Drs. Razali Umar until 1979.

In 1978
, based on the Minister of Religion decision   MAAIN changed in to MAN (Madrasah Aliyah Negeri ) Banda Aceh I on March 16, 1978. From 1979 to 1985, the leadership of Banda Aceh MAN I chaired by Drs. M. Jamil Rawa. From 1985 to 1990,  MAN Banda Aceh I led by Drs. Djakfar Ali. At that time , MAN was  developed some  buildings (the teachers' lounge and library) and science laboratories and the additions of the program study.
Based
 on the minister of Religion decision  No. 101 , MAN Banda Aceh I opened four program options, namely: a) Program A-1 which sciences of Religion, b) program A-2  the sciences of Physics, c) Program A-3, namely Sciences of  Biology and A-4 program, namely social sciences. Besides the four programs, MAN Banda Aceh I also opened Madrasah Aliyah Special Program (MAPK)  based on the Ministery of religion no 73 year 1987. From 1990 to 1993, MAN Banda Aceh I was led by Drs. A. Rahman T.B.  At the time of his leadership, MAN is growing again with the construction of a language laboratory and a computer room. At that time, the total number of classrooms were 26 classes with  ± 1,125 students.
In 1994, Man Banda Aceh I implemented new curriculum based on the ministry of religion decision No 373 year 1993 about “ the curriculum of islamic school 1994” and opened three program options, namely: a) Language courses, b) Natural Sciences, and c) Program IPS / Social Sciences.
Started from August 31, 1993 until December 30, 1998   MAN Banda Aceh I led by  Drs. A. Majid Yahya. The days of his leadership, MAN Banda Aceh I continue to be built and developed.
Since December 30, 1998, MAN Banda Aceh-I led by Drs. Zulhelmi A.Rahman. Under his leadership, MAN Banda Aceh-I changed status to MAN Model Banda Aceh. The next headmaster of Man Model Banda Aceh was Drs. H. Amiruddin Husein, since 2003 until November 5, 2006. During his leadership, MAN Model continue to reform and change towards the better  facilities, rehabilitation of classroom, library and Office.
Then, from  November 6, 2006 to December 27, 2010 MAN Model led by Drs. M.Rizal Mohin M.Pd, and he made MAN Model Banda Aceh became the center of research and development (R & D Center) for all Islamic School ( Madrasah) teachers in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam.
December 27, 2010 Man Model led by Drs. Ridwan Ali, M.Pd. Under the leadership of Drs. Ridwan Ali, M. Pd, making the learning system, student affairs, administrative offices, a library at MAN Model based IT and internet use to the maximum through the ISIS (Integrated School Information System). It also carried out through the development program MAN Model Boarding School Program and open the Religious Department. In 2015, the headmaster of Man Model was changed by Drs. H Mukhlis MPd.

Facilities

In Man Model Banda Aceh there are 27 classes as follow: for  first grade: 3 class for natural science including 1 for boarding class, 3 classes for social science, a religion class and a language class. For second grade : 5 classes for natural science including 2 classes for boarding, 3 classes for social science, a religion class and a language class. For third grade: 4 classes for natural science, 3 classes for social science, a religion class and a language class. Besides, in Man Model there are some room such as: offices, a library, a computer lab, a natural science lab, a language lab, a counseling room, a student council room and other organization room. The books in library are enough for all students.

Achievements

Man Model have won numerous achievements in some aspect such as: academic aspect ( regional and national level Olympics. Art aspect and religious aspect.

Alumni

So far the alumni of Man Model have been passed to various public and private universities in Indonesia especially in Aceh. Man Model students have passed to Gajah Mada University (UGM), IPB, UII, UNSYIAH, UIN etc.

Organization

There are some organizations such as students council (OSIM), dakwah, Red Cross Teenager ( PMR), scouts, theater, PIK-R, GMM, basketball, volleyball, art etc.

Students’ Background

The students of Man Model Banda Aceh come from various regions in Aceh with different economic background. The job of their parents are approximately around  45% of parents work as civil servants, 30% work as businessmen or traders, 15% work as farmers or planters and 10% others.

Habit

In Man Model, every Monday is held the ceremony and every Friday morning   students and teacher gather to recite surah Yasin together in the field.




Planning goals and Learning outcomes

Planning Goals and Learning Outcomes

A.      Introduction

There are some crucial dimensions of decision making in curriculum planning. The curriculum planners should know what language is, what teaching is, why learners study, how they learn, in what condition they learn, how their teachers help them, what material used, etc. Therefore, the planners need to collect the information that can be used to develop learners’ need and analyze the contextual factors where language is taught.
After all of information is completed, the planners start to determine the goal and outcomes of a program. Several key assumptions about goals characterized the curriculum approach to educational planning. These can be summarized as follows:
1.     People are generally motivated to pursue specific goals.
2.    The use of goals in teaching improves the effectiveness of teaching and learning.
3.    A program will be effective to the extent that is its goal are sound and clearly described.(Richard (2001)
Language programs describe their goal in terms of aims and objectives. Aims reflect the ideology of curriculum and show how curriculum will seek to realize it. Aims statement are generally derived from information gathered during a need analysis, and objective in language teaching are based on understanding of the nature of the subject matter being taught (e.g. listening, speaking reading, writing).
If we use the analogy of a journey, the goal is the destination, the different points we pass through the journey to the destination are the objectives, the kinds of transportation we use are the enabling activities, how to manage the journey to arrive at the destination is the classroom management, and the course or program is the journey.to teach English, it was necessary to find answers to much more specific questions:
  • *      Should students study the literature and culture of speakers of the language they are learning, or just learn to speak and use the language as tool?
  • *      Should teachers just prepare students to pass a flawed language exam, or should teachers together seek ways of finding fairer methods of assessment?


To answer those questions, Eisner (1992) proposed five curriculum ideologies that shape the nature of language curriculum and the practices of language taeching different ways. They are:

1.Academic Rationalism

It is also known as classical humanism, and stresses the intrinsic value of the subject matter and its role in developing the learner’s intellect, humanistic values, and rationality. It is sometimes used to justify the inclusion of certain foreign languages in school curricula, where they are taught not as tools for communication but as an aspect of social studies.

2.      Social And Academic Eficiency

It emphasizes the practical needs of learners and society and the role of an educational program in producing learners who are economically productive. It leads to an emphasis on practical and functional skills in a foreign or second language. Therefore, it needs of society as a justification for the teaching of English. Successful economies in the twenty first century are increasingly knowledge based, and the bulk of the world’s knowledge is in the English language.  Freire describes this as a ‘banking model’: “Education thus become an act of depositing, in which the students are depositories and the teacher is depositor.”  On the other hand, advocates of this approach argue that the curriculum should above all focus on knowledge and skills that are relevant to the learner’s everyday life needs and that the curriculum should be planned to meet the practical needs of society.

3.      Learner- Centeredness

It stresses the individual needs of learners, the role of individual experience, and the need to develop awareness, self-reflection, critical thinking, learner strategies, and other qualities and skills that are believed to be important for learners to develop. This view is also known as constractivism.

4.      Social reconstructionism

Social Reconstructionists assume that education is the social process through which society is reconstructed. They have faith in the ability of education, through the medium of curriculum, to teach people to understand their society in such a way that they can develop a vision of a better society and act to bring that vision into existence.

5.      Cultural Pluranism

This philosophy argues that schools should prepare student to participate in several different cultures and not merely the culture of the dominant social and economic group. Banks (1988) argues that students in multicultural societies such as the United States need to develop cross-cultural competency or what is sometimes termed intercultural communication. (https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/curriculum-development-in-language-teaching/planning-goals-and-learning-outcomes/30477F18DCBD364AD9F3C518297B027E. retrieved on tuesday, may 2nd 2017 at 02:015 pm).

B.     Planning Goals and Objectives

Goal
Goals are a way of putting into words the main purposes and intended outcomes of your course. If we use the analogy of a journey, the destination is the goal; the journey is the course. The objectives are the different points you pass through on the jorney to the destination. Stating your goals helps to bring into focus your vision and priorities for the course. A goal stated an aim that that the course will explicitly address in some ways. For example in writing class: by the end of the courses students will have become more aware of their writing in general and will be able to identify the specific areas in which improvement is needed. At the same time, goals are futured oriented as stated by Brown (cited in Graves:2000: ) goals are” what the students should be able to do when they leave the program.
Objective
Objective are statements about how the goals will be achieved. By achieving the objectives, the goal will be reached. Objectives are in a hierarchical relationship to goals. Goals are more general and objective are more specific. For every goal there are several objectives to help achieve it. Goals are more long term, objective more short term.

Formulating goals and objectives helps to build a clear vision of what you will teach. Clear goals help to make teaching purposeful because what you do in class is related to your overall purpose. Goals and objectives provide a basis for making choices about what to teach and how. Stating goals and objectives is a way of holding yourself accountable throughout the course (Graves:2000, 79-80).

C.    Learning Outcome


Watson (2002:208) defines a learning outcome as ‘being something that students can do now that they could not do previously … a change in people as a result of a learning experience’.  It has long been recognised that education and training are concerned with bringing about change in individuals, and the use of learning outcomes to describe these changes is certainly not a new practice.
Carey and Gregory (2003) as cited in  Maher , 2004) point out that as long ago as the 1930s in the USA, Ralph Tyler pioneered an ‘objectives-based’ approach to education in schools. Perhaps though, the most well known contribution to the development of outcomes-based curricula was the publication of A Taxonomy of Cognitive Objectives by Benjamin Bloom in 1956. Bloom’s taxonomy provided a framework for classifying learning in cognitive terms that expressed different kinds of student thinking (i.e. knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation). Recently updated by Anderson and Krathwohl (2001), Bloom’s taxonomy has stood the test of time and underpins the design of many outcomes-based curricula the world over. The past decade however has witnessed something of a culture change in education and there is recognition that much is to be gained by moving away from the conception of a content-based focus of curriculum to a more student-centred approach ( Maher, 2004).

1.      Proposed benefits of learning outcomes


§  Putting the student at the centre of the learning experience: from teaching to learning

An influential paper published by Barr and Tagg in 1995 entitled ‘From Teaching to Learning: A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education’ strongly advocated the need to move from what the authors termed the traditional ‘instructional paradigm’ with its focus on teaching and instruction to a ‘learning paradigm’ that enables students to discover and construct knowledge for themselves. if students are given a real stake in their own learning in this way, they will learn better and will be more motivated and enthusiastic about what they are learning. This approach, it is argued, should also encourage them to become more independent and autonomous learners.

§  Accreditation of learning: recognising student achievement outside of the class

Learning outcomes are also seen to have direct benefits for accrediting students’ learning outside of the class, by providing a clear indication of what students are expected to achieve in relation to specific awards. Outcomes describe explicitly what learners will be able to do as a result of learning as well as the standards which will be required in the accreditation and assessment of that learning.

2.       Examples of course-level learning outcomes

         Art History - Students will interpret art works to establish a perspective on the subject matter and the meaning of their imagery (iconography)
         Chemistry- Students will develop an appreciation for the application of organic synthesis to the solution of modern-day technological and social challenges



Referencies
Graves. K.(2000). Designing language Course: A Guide for Teacher. Canada : Heinle & Heinle Publishers.p. 73-80.
Maher. A.(2004). Learning outcomes in Higher Education: implication for Curriculum Design and student learning. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure,Sport and Tourism Education,3(2). UK : Oxford
Richard.J.C (2001). Curriculum Development In language Teaching. United Kingdom: Cambridge.
Watson, P. (2002) The role and integration of learning outcomes into the educational process. Active Learning in Higher Education 3(3), 205-219.




Rabu, 03 Mei 2017

English Language Teaching In Indonesia

Academic Essay

English Language Teaching in Indonesia: problems, challenges and prospects

Written By Najmiatul Fauza
English Department Student of Ar-Raniry Islamic University

1.Introduction

English is the language of international communication. There was estimation by the year 2000, people who spoke it was about 1.500 milion worldwide. They consisted of  329 milion asmother tounge in UK, USA, Ausrtalia, New Zealand and 430 milion as second language in countries such as India, Singapore, Malaysia and Pakistan. Besides, 750 milion people spoke it as foreign language such as Indonesia, Vietnam, China,  and Brazil (Lauder, 2008). According to The Ministry(2015), Indonesia is a second after China in terms of the number of children learning English as a foreign language in elementary school. After the 1945 independence, English that was mandated as the first foreign language to be learnt. Since then, teaching English has gradually evolved across various teaching approach and method. Furthermore, the teaching of English in Indonesia has been far from successful . Some common English language teaching (ELT) problems  in indonesia such as lack of students’motivation, quality of teachers and curriculum changes. Moreover, in  this globalization era can also be a challenge for teachers, students and government  such as  class size and the use of ICT the  teaching- learning process. However, as Archand (1996) said that mastering English is one of the requirements for economic development. People who have proficiency of English can access the large number of jobs and career in many national and international organization. This article will discuss problems, challenges and prospect of English language teaching in Indonesia. 

2. Discussion


2.1. Problems


2.1.1. Lack of students’ motivation

Motivation can not be separated from teaching learning process. Gardner (1985) defined motivation as combination of effords, desire to achieve the goal of language learning, and favorable attitude toward language learning. He also had said that where learners have to opt in or out of opportunities for learning, motivation is likely to be the strongest predictor of success than aptitude. Lack of students’motivation results in language learning failure. As Dardjowidjojo ( 1996) claims that the lack of students’motivation, low demeanor of students in learning English and infirmity of the English language teachers capabilty are the contributors of the low ability in English. The low motivation of students is due to various factors: Inadequate family support, local environment and the school context (Marcellino,2008; Yulia, 2013).  Some students also ascribe English as a “monster” together with mathematics subject (Yulia, 2013). It might happen because the teachers sometimes are “strict” in terms of English formula or rules that students need to memorize rather than creating activities for them to have fun in learning English.
In some aspects learners background is also the factor of  lack of students’ motivation. In many English foreign language ( EFL) context, particularly in rural area, children may struggle to understand the relevance of the learning English as they have little contact with speakers of the language( Ho, 2003). This might have happened because English is a foreign language not commonly used in daily Indonesian life. As Marcellino (2008) says that English in mandatory at high school and that the students are obliged to learn it, their motivation to study is subject to question given the fact that they live in an environment in which knowledge of English is not compulsory. For instance: students at school seem to use vernaculars more or local languages than English ( Yulia, 2013). Therefore, to improve the students motivation in learning needs help from all parties, especially the teachers. They must provide comfortable classroom for them, so they will be motivated in learning English.

2.1.2    2.1.2Teachers’ professionalism 

The teachers’professionalism is also one of the significant problems in ELT, as Sahiruddin(2013) says that teachers personal credentials are subject to question. Dardjowidjojo (2003) affirms  that many teachers of English graduating from FKIP and IKIP (teachers training institute) have not even reached the good level of  using English. Besides, they play an important role in the classroom, what teachers perform in the classroom is the realization of a quantity of roles and responsibilities given to them: to design, to commence, to guide learning, to facilitate, to observe, and to asses  learning process. In Indonesia,the reality shows that as Marcellino (2013) claims that the English teachers language proficiency are very poor. The majority of these teachers deliver the lesson in the mother tougue of the children, either Indonesian or indigenous language, primarily due to self perceived low level of communicative competence in the target language( chodijah, 2008; musthafa, 2001). For example: they frequently use Indonesian language  to discuss the instructional topic in the classroom, so the students will be more passive. Whereas, as Sullivan (2011) concluded that teachers’oral proficiency in the target language is a significant factor in both teaching effectiveness and students learning.
In brief, based on the problems above, the teachers should be given the  training program about the effective stategies and methods  for teaching English, as Wati(2011) says that training program can give good impact in teacher improvement.

2.1.3     2.1.3.  Curriculum changes


The definition of curriculum emerges from various sides. As noted by Arifin ( 2011, p. 2-3),” curriculum is a range of subject that must be taken or resolve school tuition at the school to obtain the certificate. Indonesian curricula have changed for several times during the past fifty years as responding to wolrd wide ELT methodologies; (a) 1945’s grammar translation-based curriculum, (b) 1958’s audio lingual based-curriculum, (c) 1975’s revised audio lingual-based curriculum, (d) 1984’s structure-based communicative curriculum, (e) 1994’s meaning-based communicative curriculum, (f) 2004’s competency-based curriculum ( sahiruddin, 2013, p.568). The changes of English curricula since 1975 in our country have not yet brought any significant and substantial impact upon the ELT class success( Marcellino, 2008). He also says that the failure of this approach was mainly caused by the fact that some requirements were not fulfiled and the teacher found it confusing to implement the curriculum at the school and classroom level.  For example: most of the teachers appeared to understand the curriculum policies at the surface level but did not understand the substance of the curriculum(Sulfansyah., Haig, Y.,& Pugh, C.B,2015). An implementation of new curriculum  is connected to the change process of improving school and teacher practice. Teachers and schools need to practice all aspects that should be changed before they will seriously undertake meaningful change.

2.2. Challenges


 2.2.1. Globalization


In regard of competition in globalization, Indonesia strugles very hard to participate. Fox (2001) defined global is shifting from local control to become global. He also mentions that business in this age must be able to compete globally. Economic globalization can be seen as the latest version of capitalizm( Fox, 2001). In order to compete with other nations, English is inevitably a primary tool in economic war for communication and negotiation ( yusny, 2013). According to Kacru and Smith ( 2008. p.201): in the era of globalization and rapid diffusion of knowledge, all the nations are aware of the need to prepare these citizens in ways that to ensure their prosperity and eminence in the world. In order to be competitive, they have to be able to function well in multinational industrial enterprises, international trade, diplomacy and scientific technological areas of expertise. They have to be innovative and contribute to the knowledge-based of the world. In order to achieve these goals, they need to be able to utilize the most widely used medium, English. The success and the continuity of ELT in Indonesia is the responsibility of all parties, especially those concerned with the provision of education. As Yusny (2013) says that ELT can be a important weapon to make this half conscious society to provide agency service for the imperial competitors’ economic power benefit.  

2.2.2. The use ICT in the classroom



Information and Communication Technology( ICT) has been used in almost all field of life, including in education. Syukur (2015) defines that ICT is a technology used to process the data including processing, obtaining, compiling, storing, manipulating data in various ways to produce quality information. According to Gur(2014) that technology has revolutionized society in many places around the globe, including how language instruction is taught and delivered. Learning by using ICT optimally will be able to improve students’achievement. There is a large number of English teachers in Indonesia, who are not able to use ICT in the teaching- learning process. Lack of teachers’ability to use ICT in learning is a challenge that must be resolved to improve the quality of education. Further,future teachers require preparation to interact with ICT-enabled learning to meet the need of those students.

2.2.3.   Reducing large class size



 Having fewer children in the class is attractive for both parents and teachers. According to Lewit & Baker (1997) define class size is the number of students for whom a teacher is primarily responsible during a school year. In many part of the world, large classes are a common challenge ( Ho,2003) causing teachers to believe it is difficult or impossible to introduce learner-centered teaching because they cannot closely monitor students’language use. As Sulistyowati (2012) states that the ideal number of students in foreign language consist no more than 25 students, but a typical classroom in Indonesia consist of 30-40 students, with some exceeding 45( Zein, 2016). He also says that placed the number of students in average classroom, some parents are concerned that their children do not receive adequate individual attention from the teacher. On recent national poll found that 70% of adults believe that reducing class size would result in big developments in public school (Lewit & Baker, 1997). Teachers feel that the smaller classes encourage increased student- teacher interaction. Regarding the effect of class size on students’ performance. As Koenig., Grag., Lewis., & Martin (2015) state that  smaller class  affects a student’s ability to process and to learn information such as instructor quality, course content and exam difficulty. Therefore, as developing country, as sulistyowati states that Indonesia has many problems deal with the students’ population and also budget of education. the class size reduction is a big challenge for Indonesian government because of the additional teachers and facilities required.

2.3. Prospects


 2.3.1. Economic Development



The part that language might play in economic development has long intrigued scholars from various discipline. English is a tool of international communication, it also a tool for economic development. According to Bourdieu (1990) that English can lead to the improvement of one’s economic and social status. It is widely accepted that majority of  knowledge is created by develop countries in which English has enjoy special status and it also recognized that developing countries such as Indonesia enjoy efficiency gains if they adopt the knowledge created in developed countries (Lee, no year).for instance: machineries usually come with instruction or manual in English. Without basic understanding of English, workers are generally unable to use these machineries in productive activities. In addition, the exigencies of the language’s import in transacting business and communicating with neighboring countries such as Singapore, Malaysia, India and other countries in the opinion of Lauder(2008) makes the learning inevitable. According to Lauder (2008. P.), in Indonesia  the role of English is very important in economic and business. For example: The USA’s position as the world’s number one economic exerts a pull on global business. He also said that organizations which wish to enter the international market are not able to do so without using English. The tourist industry in particular is dependent on English, but any multinational business with international offices must have staffs who can work in English.

2.3.2. Future Jobs



English language is one of the requirements for getting a better job. As Passaung (1995) says that in certain urban areas, especially in big cities the actual need for English may be more intermediate and apparent, since some white collar jobs in big private companies may require English as prerequisite. Hence they include an English language test in their employee requirement. The great widespread and hightened need for learning English as the most essential international language for doing international communication and business. And it continuously increases as more and more people are wanting or being require to learn and master English for different purposes( Richard, 1985). Business can not wait, there are insufficient employees with sufficiently good English to fill jobs that require little more than rudimentary English language proficiency. The required number of employees in this globalization era with excellent English speaking ability.
The year 2020 known as Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) demand highly qualified and creative individual to compete in every walk of life. The need of mastering English is strongly felt. This is a big chance for Indonesian students who mastering English to compete with other students from other countries.

2.3.3. Better Future education



The number of international students who look for education by crossing the border of countries continue higher every year. According to Sawir (2005) there are approximately 1.7 milion students in Asia who seek international studies in countries speak English as mother tougue. As well, Indonesian middle class are beginning to find that sending their children to Australia, Singapore or Malaysia for their education becomes an option (Lauder, 2008). According to Novera (2004), Australia is a major global provider of international education, and is the third largest provider at degree level after the United State and The united Kingdom. In 2003, 11.865 students from Indonesia were enrolled in Australian higher education institutions of whom 8307 (70%) were in either business studies (5590) or information Technology (2717) programs and (1065) enrolled in engineering (Novera, 2004, p. 475). One of the requirement to continue study in those countries is the test level of English proficiency  such as Test of English as Foreign Language (TOEFL). As Lee (no year)
tells that TOEFL exams are taken by those who plan to live ,to work or to Australia and New Zealand.

3. conclusion



The findings in this report clearly that English is the language of international communication. In Indonesia, English  was mandated as the first foreign language to be learnt. In implementing English language teaching, there are three common problems.1) lack of students’ motivation. It can be caused by some factors such as learners’background, English is a foreign language for Indonesian students and their perspective about English as a “monster” together with mathematics. 2) Quality of teachers. The role of teachers in the classroom is very essential to the students’ achievement but there are some teachers who have low English proficiency, so in the classroom they teach the students by using Indonesian or indigenous. This activity will lead students to be more passive.3) Curriculum Changes. Indonesian curricula have changed for several times during the past fifty years, but the changes is not a good solution for improving English language teaching. The changes of curriculum result in teachers’confusion in implementing in the classroom.
 In other hand, there are three challenges found in English language teaching in Indonesia.1. Globalization. In this era the students are challenged to learn English harder because they will compete with other nations to gain a good job in the future. 2. The use of ICT in the teaching learning process. To make the learning more effective the teacher must be able to use ICT to create the  creative material.3. Reducing large class size. This is become a challenge for Indonesia as developing country because the reduction of large class is costly.
In addition, not only the problems and challenges that faced by Indonesian students in learning English but also they will gain some prospects. First, Economic development. English as international language play an important role in economic such as communicating with other countries by using English. Second, Future education. By mastering English Indonesian students will get a chance to study abroad such as in USA,UK, Australia Canada and New Zealand.


References
Archand, J.L.(1996). Development economic and language: the earnest search for a mirage?.                                        International Journal of Sociology of Language.(121), 119-157.
Arifin, Z.(2011). Konsep dan model kurikulum.  Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Bourdieu, P. (1990).In other word. Cambridge: Polity Press
Chodidjah, I. (2008). Scrutinizing the teaching of English in elementary schools in East Asian countries. Proceeding of  the ASIA TEFL International Conference 2008, Bali, 1–3 August 2008.
Dardjowidjojo,S.(1996). The socio-poliyical aspects of English in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal.(8),1-13.
Dardjowidjojo, S. (2003). Rampai bahasa, pendidikan dan budaya. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Fox, J.(2001). Chomsky and Globalisation. Duxford: Icon
Gardner, R.C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: the role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gur, W.(2014). The role of ICT in Indonesian language learning and the teaching of BIPA.
          Proceeding of the ASILE 2014 Conference.(pp.1). Bali, September 29-30, 2014.  
Ho, W. K. (2003). English language teaching in Asia today: An overview. In W. K. Ho & R. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), English language teaching in east Asia today: Changing policies and practices. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.
Kacru, Y& Smith,L.E.(2008). Cultures, contexts and world Englishes .New York: Taylor & Francis
Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2015). Jumlah data satuan pendidikan sekolah per provinsi [Statistics of Educational Unit per Province]. Retrieved  october 17, 2016, from http://referensi. data.kemdikbud.go.id/index11.php
Koenig, L. B., Grag. M., Lewis, S., & Martin, S. (2015). Students’ preferences for small and large class size.  International Journal of Humanities and Social Science,5(1), 20-21.
Lauder, A.(2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: a review of keys factors. Makara,Sosial Humaniora,12(1), 9-20.
Lee,C.G.(no year). English language and economic growth cross-country empirical evidence. No title of the journal. P. 3-4.
Lewit, E.M.,& Baker, L.S.(1997). Class size. The Future of Children, FINANCING SCHOOLS,7(3), 112-113.
Marcellino,M.(2008).English language teaching in Indonesia: a continuous challenge in education and cultural diversity.TEFLIN Journal,19(1),61
Musthafa, B. (2001). Communicative language teaching in Indonesia.  Journal of Southeast Asian Education,2(2), 1-9.
Novera, I.A. (2004). Indonesian postgraduate students studying in Australia: an examination of their academic social and culture experiences. International Educational Journal, 5(4). 475- 476.
Passaung, N.(1995). The teaching of EFL in the context of indonesia’s remote areas: a case of southeast Sulawesi. Proceedings of the 2nd Regional TEFLIN Conference.  UNS Solo’ 
Richard, J.C.(1985). The context of language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sahiruddin.(2013).The implementation of the 2013 curriculum and the issues of English language teaching and learning in Indonesia.The Asian Conference on language learning 2013 Official Conference Proceedings,(pp.573).japan,The International Academic Forum
Sawir, E.(2005). Language difficulties of international students in Australia: the effect of prior learning experience. International Educational Journal,6(5).
Sulfansyah., Haig, Y.,& Pugh, C.B.(2015). Indonesian teachers’ implementation of new curriculum initiatives in relation to teaching writing in lower primary school.  International Journal of Education,7(4),
Sulistyowati.(2012). Making large classes smaller: the challenge of teaching English to young learners in Indonesia. TEYLIN: from policy to classroom,(2), 170-171
Sullivan, J.H.(2011). Taking charge: teacher candidates’ preparation for the oral proficiency interview. Foreign Language Annals,44(2),441-457.
Syukur, I.A. (2014). Teacher professionalism in implementing information and communication technology in Nganjuk district. Journal Dikbud. Pp. 200-207.
Wati, H.(2011).The effectiveness of Indonesian English teachers training programs in improving convidence and motivation.International Journal of Instruction,4(1),81
Yusny,R. (2013). ELT in Indonesian context: issues and challenges. Englisia, Journal of
          Language, Education and Humanities,1(1),91-92.
Zein, M. (2016). Elementary English education in Indonesia: policy developments, current practices and future prospects.  Cambridge Journal. P. 3. Doi:10.1017/S02660784 16000407.
.